|
Results 1 - 10 of about 270 for microsoft .net framework.
Search took 0.85 seconds.
|
 |
TEC Products
|
|
Microsoft http://www.technologyevaluation.com/ppc/evaluation-erp.asp |
|
|
Subtle (or Not-so-subtle) Nuances of Microsoft .NET Enablement
| by P.J. Jakovljevic |
... Pronounced "dot net," and widely known as the Microsoft .NET Framework, it
was designed to compete with the counterpart Java-based Java 2 Enterprise Edition ...
|
|
| http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/ERP/2006/10/research_notes/TU_ER_PJ_10_02_06_1.asp - 14k - 2006-10-02 |
| Summary: The Microsoft .NET strategy continues to confuse many, due to the lack of understanding of the technology. Indeed, because
of the massive marketing campaign undertaken by Microsoft, many vendors have adopted a 'too liberal' approach to marketing
.NET Framework-based initiatives.
|
|
Microsoft .NET Enablement: Analysis and Cautions
| by P.J. Jakovljevic |
... The Microsoft .NET Framework includes these elements, as well as a worldwide network of
more than 35,000 Microsoft Certified Partner organizations to provide ...
|
|
| http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/ERP/2006/10/research_notes/TU_ER_PJ_10_04_06_1.asp - 18k - 2006-10-04 |
| Summary: Using technologies that are intrinsically compatible should result in faster and less costly development. Thus, any application
suite rewritten in the Microsoft .NET managed code framework should not have to contend with inefficiencies resulting from
mixing or wrapping technologies.
|
|
Microsoft .NET-managed Code Enablement: Examples and Challenges
| by P.J. Jakovljevic |
... The product is written completely in .NET-managed code, and on the very latest Microsoft .NET
Framework 2.0, Microsoft SQL Server 2005, VS.NET 2005, and Web ...
|
|
| http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/ERP/2006/10/research_notes/TU_ER_PJ_10_05_06_1.asp - 22k - 2006-10-05 |
| Summary: Intuitive, Visibility, and Epicor offer .NET Framework-managed code products, but their 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it'
mindset might work against them unless they can prove higher value propositions, such as new, more quickly developed vertical
functionality.
|
|
Habilitación en Microsoft .NET: análisis y precauciones
| by P.J. Jakovljevic |
... Además de estos elementos, Microsoft .NET Framework cuenta con una red mundial de más
de 35,000 empresas certificadas como Microsoft Certified Partner que ...
|
|
| http:/.../es/Research/ResearchHighlights/ERP/2006/10/research_notes/es/TU_ER_PJ_10_04_06_1.asp - 20k |
| Summary: El uso de tecnologías que son en esencia compatibles debe producir un desarrollo menos costoso y más rápido. De esta forma,
cualquier serie de aplicaciones que se haya reescrito en estructura de código administrado Microsoft .NET no tiene que enfrentarse
a las ineficacias que resultan de mezclar o 'e
|
|
La habilitación en código administrado Microsoft .NET: ejemplos ...
| by P.J. Jakovljevic |
... Está escrito completamente en código administrado .NET y en las últimas versiones de Microsoft
.NET Framework 2.0, Microsoft SQL Server 2005, VS.NET 2005 y ...
|
|
| http:/.../es/Research/ResearchHighlights/ERP/2006/10/research_notes/es/TU_ER_PJ_10_05_06_1.asp - 25k |
| Summary: Intuitive, Visibility y Epicor ofrecen productos que tienen código administrado Microsoft .NET, pero su idea de 'no reparar
lo que no está descompuesto' puede serles contraproducente si no prueban tener propuestas de mayor valor, como son las funciones
verticales nuevas y desarrolladas en menos tiempo.
|
|
Examples of Microsoft .NET Enablement
| by P.J. Jakovljevic |
... spent years developing its .NET Framework-based solution during the same time period of Microsoft's
efforts to launch the .NET Framework technology commercially ...
|
|
| http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/ERP/2006/10/research_notes/TU_ER_PJ_10_03_06_1.asp - 26k - 2006-10-03 |
| Summary: SYSPRO and Epicor are examples of .NET-enabled legacy software systems that have partly been componentized (rewritten), with
'wrappers' added to the rest so that the legacy functionality can be used and extended through Web services on the .NET Framework.
|
|
Los sutiles (o no tan sutiles) matices de la habilitación de ...
| by P.J. Jakovljevic |
... Se pronuncia punto net y se conoce como Microsoft .NET Framework. Se diseñó para
competir con la plataforma Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE). ...
|
|
| http:/.../es/Research/ResearchHighlights/ERP/2006/10/research_notes/es/TU_ER_PJ_10_02_06_1.asp - 15k |
| Summary: La estrategia de Microsoft .NET sigue confundiendo a muchas personas que no terminan de entender la tecnología. De hecho,
la masiva campaña de mercadeo que emprendió Microsoft ha hecho que muchos vendedores se enfoquen de forma 'muy liberal' en
el mercadeo de las iniciativas basadas en .NET Framework.
|
|
Ejemplos de habilitación en Microsoft .NET
| by P.J. Jakovljevic |
... SYSPRO dedicó años al desarrollo de su solución por .NET Framework justo cuando Microsoft
trabajaba en el lanzamiento comercial de su tecnología .NET ...
|
|
| http:/.../es/Research/ResearchHighlights/ERP/2006/10/research_notes/es/TU_ER_PJ_10_03_06_1.asp - 28k |
| Summary: SYSPRO y Epicor son dos ejemplos de sistemas legados habilitados en .NET que han sido parcialmente reescritos agregando aplicaciones
'wrapper' para poder usar y aumentar las funciones legadas mediante servicios Web o en el .NET Framework.
|
|
Great Plains' eEnterprise Solution 'N Sync with Microsoft's New ...
| by P.J. Jakovljevic |
... on the Microsoft platform, Great Plains has extensively collaborated with Microsoft for more
than a year on the development of Microsoft's .NET Framework. ...
|
|
| http:/.../Research/ResearchHighlights/BusinessApplications/2000/10/news_analysis/NA_BA_PJ_10_31_00_1.asp - 8k - 2000-10-31 |
| Summary: Great Plains announced that its eEnterprise solution scales considerably better on Microsoft SQL Server 2000 in comparison
to Microsoft's SQL Server 7.0.
|
|
Microsoft’s Underlying Platform Parts for Enterprise ...
... What About the Microsoft .NET Framework Parts? ... Particular attention was given to
Microsoft SQL Server, SharePoint, and parts of Microsoft .NET Framework. […]. ...
|
|
| blog.technologyevaluation.com/.../ - 57k - 2008-10-22 |
|
|